English only · Odia translation in progress

Chapter 3: The Shadow System

At 4:30 in the morning, Platform 1 of Bhubaneswar railway station is already alive with a specific kind of crowd. You can identify them by their luggage: one large suitcase, one smaller bag, a backpack stuffed with NCERT textbooks and coaching material. The teenagers stand in clusters, some still half-asleep, clutching tickets for the Hirakud Express or the Purushottam Express — trains that will carry them north through Jharsuguda, across Chhattisgarh, through the western edge of Madhya Pradesh, and into Kota Junction, 1,200 kilometres and twenty-two hours away. Their parents stand beside them, mothers with swollen eyes, fathers with an expression that is equal parts pride and dread. A father from Ganjam — a government school teacher who earns Rs 35,000 a month — hands his son a Nokia phone, a thermos, and an envelope containing Rs 25,000 in cash, the first installment. He has sold a quarter-acre plot behind his ancestral home to fund this year’s coaching fees. His wife has not eaten meat in six months, saving the Rs 200 per week. The son, sixteen years old, does not fully understand what the family has staked on him. He understands enough to feel the weight.

By 5 AM, the train pulls away. The father watches until the last bogie rounds the bend past Mancheswar, then walks to the auto stand. He has a school to teach in. Government school, Odia medium, Class 8 science. He will spend the day teaching other people’s children the same physics that he has decided his own son cannot learn at home. He will do this every day for the next two years, his salary funding a coaching institute in Rajasthan because he does not trust the education system he serves with his own son’s future.

This scene repeats thousands of times every year across Odisha. Not always Kota — sometimes the train goes to Hyderabad, sometimes the bus goes to Bhubaneswar, sometimes the autorickshaw carries a child from Bolangir to a district-level tutor who charges Rs 500 a month. The scale differs. The structure does not. A parallel education system operates in the shadow of the formal one, processing hundreds of thousands of students, extracting thousands of crores from families, and sorting children by their parents’ capacity to pay rather than by any measure of talent. This is the shadow system. It is India’s largest unacknowledged institution, and it tells you more about what the formal system cannot do than any government white paper ever will.

The Arms Race

Before mapping the shadow system’s architecture, it is worth understanding the logic that sustains it. Because the shadow system is not a market failure. It is not corruption. It is not even, strictly speaking, irrational. It is the outcome of a coordination failure that game theorists would recognize immediately: an arms race.

The dynamic works like this. A competitive exam — JEE, NEET, UPSC — has a fixed number of seats and a variable number of applicants. When one family invests in coaching, their child gains an advantage over uncoached children. Other families observe this and invest too, to avoid falling behind. As coached students displace uncoached ones, the baseline shifts: what was once an advantage becomes a requirement. Now all families must invest in coaching just to remain competitive. The coaching advantage disappears precisely because everyone has it, but no individual family can afford to stop investing because unilateral disarmament means certain disadvantage.

This is a Nash equilibrium. No single family can improve their child’s position by withdrawing from coaching, because every other family is still investing. The individually rational choice — spend on coaching — produces a collectively irrational outcome: total coaching expenditure in Odisha likely falls between Rs 1,500 and 3,000 crore annually (the estimate carries uncertainty; precise state-level market data is not publicly available, but the calculation from 150,000-200,000 coaching students at an average of Rs 1-1.5 lakh each lands in this range). This money does not improve aggregate educational outcomes. It does not create more IIT seats. It does not make students smarter in any fundamental sense. It merely redistributes the same seats among students who have already been pre-sorted by their parents’ income.

The arms race has another property that Cold War strategists would recognize: escalation. Twenty years ago, coaching started at Class 11. Then foundation courses pushed it to Class 9. Then pre-foundation courses to Class 6. Allen and Aakash now offer programs starting in Class 6, costing Rs 25,000-75,000 per year. By the time the target batch begins in Class 11, the coached student has already invested four to five years and Rs 2-4 lakh. The family that enters coaching at Class 11 is now at a disadvantage not just against the coaching system but against the students who started coaching five years earlier. The ratchet only turns one way.

In nuclear strategy, this dynamic was called the security dilemma: each nation’s defensive buildup appeared offensive to the other, triggering mutual escalation with no increase in anyone’s security. In Odisha’s coaching economy, each family’s investment appears threatening to every other family, triggering mutual escalation with no increase in anyone’s chances of admission. The only entities that benefit from the escalation are the arms manufacturers — the coaching institutes themselves. Allen’s revenue reached Rs 3,310 crore in FY2025. Physics Wallah is valued at $2.8 billion. These are not education companies. They are the Lockheed Martins of the aspiration economy, profiting from an arms race that their existence perpetuates.

The Kota Pipeline

Kota, Rajasthan, is the staging ground of Indian aspiration. A city of 1.2 million that hosts 85,000 to 250,000 transient coaching students in any given year — more students than many Indian cities have residents. The origin story is almost quaint: Vinod Kumar Bansal, a mechanical engineer confined to a wheelchair by a degenerative condition, began tutoring students in the 1980s. His first student cleared IIT-JEE in 1985. By 1991, he had formalized the operation as Bansal Classes. When the J.K. Synthetics factory closed in the mid-1990s, several of its engineers joined Bansal’s faculty, and others started their own coaching centers. Allen, Resonance, Motion, Vibrant — the Kota ecosystem grew not from educational innovation but from industrial unemployment, former factory workers becoming exam-preparation specialists. The parallel with Odisha’s own industrial towns — Rourkela’s steel plant workers who never seeded a local enterprise ecosystem — is instructive. Kota’s displaced engineers built an industry worth Rs 6,500-7,000 crore at its peak. Rourkela’s displaced workers built nothing comparable.

Odisha is among the states that feed the Kota pipeline. No publicly available data tracks Kota enrollment by state of origin in a consolidated form, but the pipeline’s existence is visible in train bookings, hostel registrations, and the word-of-mouth networks that carry success stories from Kota back to districts across Odisha. The districts most likely to send students: Bhubaneswar (government employee families), Cuttack (professional-class families), Rourkela (SAIL township families), and pockets of Ganjam, Balasore, and Puri where remittance income from labor migration funds the coaching investment.

The economics are unforgiving.

Expense	Annual Cost (Rs)
Coaching tuition fee	1,35,000 - 2,50,000
Hostel/PG accommodation	60,000 - 1,50,000
Food and mess charges	36,000 - 72,000
Books and study material	10,000 - 25,000
Travel (2-3 trips home/year)	15,000 - 30,000
Miscellaneous	15,000 - 30,000
Total per year	2,71,000 - 5,57,000

For a two-year JEE/NEET preparation cycle, the total investment runs from Rs 5.5 lakh to Rs 11 lakh. This excludes opportunity costs: the child contributes nothing to the household, one parent may need to visit periodically, and the emotional cost of separation does not appear on any balance sheet. For a family sending a child from Class 11 onward, Kota represents a four-to-five year financial commitment when foundation programs are included.

Against this investment, the return is statistically improbable. Approximately 20 lakh students take JEE Main annually. Roughly 50,000 get into a quality institution. For IITs specifically — the prize that justifies Kota — roughly 17,000 seats are available. The success rate is 0.85 percent. Kota’s own success ratio is better than average — roughly one in four students there gets selected for counseling in JEE or NEET — but even at Kota, three out of four families’ investments produce no seat. The majority of coaching investments are, in financial terms, sunk costs.

But the arms race logic prevails. No individual family can calculate their way out. The family that does not send the child to Kota watches other families send their children, some of whom return with IIT seats, and concludes: the problem was not the bet. The problem was that we did not place it. The failed investments are invisible — nobody advertises that their child went to Kota and failed. The successful ones are broadcast through every social network in the district. This is the classic asymmetric information problem: visible successes, invisible failures. It perpetuates the arms race just as surely as intelligence failures perpetuated the Cold War.

What Kota Costs Beyond Money

The mental health crisis among coaching students has moved from anecdote to epidemic. In 2023, between 27 and 32 student suicides were recorded in Kota — figures that vary by source, but the order of magnitude is not in dispute. That is roughly three students per month. Between 2015 and 2019, approximately 95 suicides were recorded, roughly 16 per year. The rate has nearly doubled.

The research data behind these numbers is more revealing than the numbers themselves. A comparative study published in the Indian Journal of Psychiatry found that 44.45 percent of coaching students in Kota suffered from high academic stress, compared to 3.33 percent of non-coaching students. That is not a moderate difference. It is a thirteen-fold increase. Students engage in 12-14 hours of study daily, six or seven days a week. More than 53 percent of coaching students in Kota experience loneliness — teenagers aged 15-17 who have been separated from families, friends, and any social life that does not revolve around periodic test rankings.

Only 3 percent of Kota’s coaching students have visited a mental health professional. The gap between the prevalence of psychological distress and the utilization of help is a structural feature, not an individual failing. The system that transplants a teenager from Ganjam to Kota does not budget for therapy. The family that sold land to fund coaching fees does not have an additional Rs 1,000-2,000 per session for a counselor. The coaching institute that runs test series ranking students publicly — posting their percentiles where peers can see — creates a shame architecture that functions as a pressure cooker. Those at the bottom know they are at the bottom, and they know their parents know they are at the bottom, and they know their parents cannot afford for them to remain at the bottom.

A 2024 study found that 45 percent of JEE and NEET aspirants nationwide experienced anxiety or depression. This is not the exception. This is the modal experience. The median coaching student is psychologically distressed. The system treats this as a side effect. The arms race framework suggests it is a feature: if you are building weapons designed to concentrate effort to the point of breakthrough, the human cost of that concentration is the design, not the malfunction.

The Odisha connection is specific and painful. When a student from Bolangir or Koraput — districts where parents migrate to brick kilns so children can study — arrives at Kota and confronts weekly rankings, institute transfers for underperformers, and the social isolation of being far from home with limited resources, the mental health cost falls disproportionately on those who can afford it least. The student from a Bhubaneswar professional family at least has a safety net: a phone call home does not require calculating the cost. The student from a labor-migration family carries the additional burden of knowing exactly what was sacrificed. The shame of failure is proportional to the scale of sacrifice.

Bhubaneswar’s Coaching Corridor

Bhubaneswar is where the arms race concentrates within Odisha. Every major national coaching chain maintains a presence: Allen, Aakash, FIITJEE, Resonance, Sri Chaitanya, Narayana, and Physics Wallah’s expanding Pathshala centers. These national brands compete alongside local operations — IIG Academy, Eklabya Classes, and the integrated program at ODM Public School, which has tie-ups with Allen for two-year school-cum-coaching preparation.

The national chains’ Bhubaneswar branches exist, explicitly, as Kota substitutes — attempting to provide comparable coaching quality while allowing students to remain in-state. This is the defensive position in the arms race: retain your students before they migrate to the competing ecosystem. Allen’s national results — over 17,000 selections in JEE Main and Advanced combined, with 3 of the top 10 All India Rank holders in JEE Advanced 2024 — serve as the brand that Bhubaneswar branches trade on. Aakash claimed over 22,000 JEE Main 2024 qualifiers nationally. FIITJEE reported over 12,000 JEE Main selections. These are national numbers, weaponized in local marketing.

Fee structures in Bhubaneswar’s coaching corridor span a wide range:

Stage	Typical Annual Cost (Rs)
Class 6-8 (Foundation)	25,000 - 75,000
Class 9-10 (Pre-Foundation)	50,000 - 1,25,000
Class 11-12 (Target Batch)	1,00,000 - 2,50,000
Dropper Year	1,00,000 - 2,00,000

The total coaching spend over a 5-7 year arc — from Class 6 foundation through Class 12 target batch — runs Rs 3-8 lakh at Bhubaneswar coaching centers. This does not include school fees. It does not include the “dummy school” arrangement, increasingly common, where a student enrolls in a CBSE school for Rs 60,000-2.5 lakh per year but attends only for mandatory examinations, spending the rest of their time at the coaching center. CBSE’s 75 percent attendance rule is routinely circumvented through these arrangements. In March 2025, CBSE announced that students found enrolled in dummy schools would be barred from Class 12 board examinations — an acknowledgment of scale. The bar would not be necessary if the practice were rare.

Odisha hosts 160-plus coaching institutes offering JEE and NEET preparation. Bhubaneswar concentrates the overwhelming majority. The city’s advantages compound: CBSE school ecosystem, educated population, existing hostel infrastructure, proximity to IIT Bhubaneswar and NIT Rourkela, and administrative-class families who prioritize competitive exams. Cuttack has some coaching presence, particularly for OPSC/OAS preparation and CLAT. But Rourkela, Sambalpur, Berhampur, Balasore — the secondary cities that the urbanization series identified as Odisha’s missing middle — have minimal organized coaching infrastructure. Students in these cities who are serious about JEE or NEET preparation migrate to Bhubaneswar.

This creates a nested migration pattern: from villages to district towns, from district towns to Bhubaneswar, from Bhubaneswar to Kota. Each step is driven by the same arms race logic — the coaching quality at the current location is perceived as insufficient, the next level up offers better odds. The student moves up the chain. The money moves with them. The village retains nothing.

The Three Exam Corridors

The shadow system does not serve a single market. It serves three distinct competitive exam corridors, each with its own economics, demographics, and psychology.

JEE (Joint Entrance Examination): The gateway to engineering, IITs, NITs, and IIITs. JEE Main is the first filter — approximately 12-13 lakh candidates took it in 2024. JEE Advanced, the second filter, admits roughly 2.5 lakh qualified candidates and fills roughly 17,000 IIT seats. Odisha’s Bhavesh Patra scored 100 percentile in JEE Main 2024, but in aggregate, Odisha does not appear among the top 5-6 states in JEE Advanced qualifications. The state is a mid-tier performer — producing qualifiers but not at the density of coaching-intensive states like Rajasthan, Telangana, or Maharashtra.

JEE coaching is the most expensive corridor. The emphasis on conceptual depth, problem-solving speed, and pattern recognition in physics, chemistry, and mathematics demands years of preparation starting from foundation stage. FIITJEE, Allen, and Resonance — the three anchors of this corridor — charge premium fees and attract the highest-paid faculty. Resonance alone employs 200 faculty members, 70 of whom are IIT graduates. No government school system in Odisha can attract IIT graduates to teach high school physics at Rs 2-5 lakh per year when coaching institutes offer Rs 17-20 lakh at mid-career and Rs 40 lakh-plus at senior levels. The salary differential explains the talent drain from schools to coaching with mathematical precision.

NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test): The gateway to medical education. In NEET 2024, 32,617 candidates from Odisha qualified — a respectable number that must be contextualized: Odisha offers approximately 950 MBBS and 150 BDS seats through state quota counseling. The competition ratio is roughly 30:1. NEET’s gender dynamics are distinct from JEE: 7.46 lakh girls took NEET 2024 compared to 5.8 lakh males, making it a rare exam where female participation approaches or exceeds male participation. Medicine is perceived as an “appropriate” profession for women in conservative families, driving higher female investment in NEET coaching specifically. This perception has real consequences: families that would not invest in JEE coaching for a daughter will invest in NEET coaching, because the cultural narrative around a “doctor daughter” carries marriage-market value alongside career value. (Cross-reference: The Invisible Half series documented how family investment decisions are filtered through gendered return-on-investment calculations.)

UPSC/OPSC: The civil services corridor. In UPSC CSE 2024, 18 candidates from Odisha were selected out of 1,009 total — approximately 1.8 percent of selections for a state with approximately 3.3 percent of India’s population. The highest-ranked from Odisha was Ritika Rath at AIR 48. OPSC, the state-level equivalent, recommended 398 candidates for Group A and B posts in the 2023 cycle. Bhubaneswar’s Apti Plus — one of Odisha’s oldest civil services coaching institutes, with 25-plus faculty members — dominates this corridor. UPSC coaching economics differ from JEE/NEET: the preparation is longer (3-5 years is common), the age of aspirants is higher (22-30), and the financial commitment accumulates differently. A ground report by The Print documented families selling land, taking loans against farmland, and reducing household consumption to fund UPSC coaching — with sisters dropping out of school so that all resources could be directed toward the son’s preparation.

Each corridor creates its own arms race within the broader arms race. NEET aspirants compete with other NEET aspirants for coaching resources. JEE aspirants form their own sub-economy. UPSC aspirants occupy a separate world entirely. But the logic is identical across all three: fixed seats, growing applicants, rising coaching expenditure, no improvement in aggregate probability.

District-Level Coaching: The Informal Economy

Below the organized coaching sector — the Allens and the FIITJEEs — lies a vast, informal tutoring economy that sustains itself across every district in Odisha. This is the shadow system’s shadow system.

In district headquarters like Balasore, Baripada, Koraput, and Angul, private tutors operate from converted living rooms, rented halls, or the back rooms of stationery shops. A retired government school teacher offering evening tuitions in mathematics charges Rs 300-800 per student per month. With batches of 15-30 students, this generates Rs 4,500-24,000 per month — often exceeding the pension income that the teacher draws from the government. For students in these towns who cannot afford to relocate to Bhubaneswar for coaching, these tutors are the only bridge between the state board curriculum and competitive exam preparation.

The tutoring economy that sustains retired teachers is not incidental. It is structural. A government school teacher who spent thirty years earning Rs 18,000-50,000 per month retires and immediately enters the private coaching market, where the same knowledge commands higher returns because it is now delivered to willing, paying customers rather than to captive, compulsion-attending students. The irony is systemic: the teacher’s skills were undervalued by the formal system for three decades and are immediately monetized by the shadow system upon retirement. The formal system trained the teacher. The shadow system profits from them.

At the village level, the coaching economy becomes even more granular. A college graduate in a village who cleared JEE Main but did not get a seat at a quality institution might offer tuitions to local students. An engineering dropout might teach physics to Class 11 students. The quality is variable, the infrastructure is minimal, and the outcomes are modest. But for a family earning Rs 8,000-15,000 per month, spending Rs 300-500 on a local tutor is the maximum possible investment in the arms race. They are not competing against Allen. They are trying to ensure their child clears the state board examination with enough marks to enter a degree college — the first step in a longer ladder.

This bottom tier of the shadow system is rarely discussed in coaching industry analyses, which focus on the organized sector. But it may account for more students and more total expenditure than the organized sector, simply because of the scale: if 27 percent of Indian students take some form of private coaching (per the NSS 80th round data), and most of these students are in rural areas using informal tutors rather than branded institutes, then the shadow system’s base is wider and shallower than the Bhubaneswar coaching corridor suggests. The average annual household expenditure on coaching in rural areas is Rs 1,793 per student — modest, but multiplied across millions of students, it represents a significant extraction from families that can afford it least.

The Family Economics of the Arms Race

Consider a mid-level government employee in Odisha — ten to fifteen years of service, earning Rs 35,000-50,000 per month after allowances. Annual take-home: Rs 4.2-6 lakh. This is the aspirational middle class, the backbone of the coaching market.

Against this income, a single year of coaching at a national chain consumes 17-60 percent of annual income. Two years of Kota preparation including living costs: 90-260 percent of annual income. A complete five-year coaching trajectory: 50-190 percent of annual income. For a family earning Rs 5 lakh per year, spending Rs 2 lakh on coaching for one child means 40 percent of income is consumed by a single child’s competitive exam preparation. If there are two children, the arithmetic is devastating.

The borrowing begins here. A 2023 ground report documented in vivid detail how families across India sell land, take loans against farmland, and reduce household consumption to fund coaching. In Odisha, the phenomenon intersects with existing migration patterns in a particularly painful way. Families in western Odisha districts — Bolangir, Nuapada, Kalahandi, Bargarh — already send adults to brick kilns and construction sites in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. The remittance income from this labor migration — itself a survival strategy — is increasingly redirected to fund children’s coaching fees. (Cross-reference: The Leaving documented this migration pipeline in detail. The coaching economy is the next node in the same extraction chain.)

The aspiration is circular: families endure the grinding poverty of labor migration precisely so that their children might escape it through competitive exam success. The Rs 1-2 lakh spent on coaching represents not just money but the accumulated physical labor of parents working in brick kilns, textile mills, and construction sites. When that investment fails to produce a seat — as it statistically will for three out of four families — the labor was spent, the years were lost, and the child returns to a starting point that may be worse than where the family began, because now there is also debt.

The opportunity cost is never calculated, because the arms race does not permit calculation of alternatives. Rs 2 lakh could fund the annual education of three to four children at a government school. Rs 5 lakh could serve as working capital for a small business or fund agricultural improvements. Rs 10 lakh — the total cost of a two-year Kota stint — represents the cost of purchasing a small plot of land in many rural Odisha districts. The foregone earnings of the student during the coaching period — two to four years of productive labor, or potential income from a diploma or ITI course — are never entered into the ledger.

But these alternatives are invisible to the family in the grip of the arms race. The family sees two outcomes: the child cracks JEE and the family’s trajectory changes permanently, or the child does not crack JEE and is “just like everyone else.” There is no middle path in the arms race imagination. And so the family sells the land.

What the Shadow System Reveals

The coaching economy is, by itself, the most damning indictment of India’s formal education system. If schools were adequately preparing students for competitive examinations, the industry would not exist at Rs 50,000-60,000 crore nationally. Its existence is not a market innovation. It is a confession of institutional failure.

The failure has a specific structure in Odisha. Three systems operate side by side but serve different populations:

The state board system. BSE Odisha (Board of Secondary Education) and CHSE Odisha (Council of Higher Secondary Education) serve the majority. The state board curriculum covers the national syllabus framework but has been perceived as less rigorous in science and mathematics compared to CBSE. Critically, competitive exams — JEE, NEET — are based on NCERT textbooks, which are the CBSE standard. A state board student in Odisha starts with a structural disadvantage: their textbooks do not precisely match the exam syllabus. (Cross-reference: Chapter 2 of this series documented the language and medium divide. The state board-CBSE gap is the same stratification mechanism operating through curriculum rather than language.)

The CBSE system. Approximately 307 CBSE-affiliated schools operate in Odisha, predominantly in Bhubaneswar and other urban centers. CBSE students have better alignment with competitive exam syllabi. But CBSE alone is insufficient — the exams test conceptual depth, problem-solving speed, and application at a level that school instruction, even CBSE instruction, does not systematically develop.

The coaching system. This fills the gap between what schools teach and what exams demand. Coaching institutes provide their own study materials, test series, and problem banks that go, in the words of one analysis, “far beyond the NCERT framework, creating a black-market curriculum where test performance, not knowledge, is king.”

The result is a three-tier sorting: students following state board curriculum only (effectively locked out of competitive exam success), CBSE students who have a better foundation but still need coaching, and coaching-plus-CBSE students who are the only cohort with a realistic chance at top-tier results. A student’s position in this hierarchy is determined at age 10 or 11, by their parents’ income and location.

Odisha’s teacher vacancy crisis makes the institutional failure concrete. The state has 44,433 teaching positions to fill between 2025 and 2028 — a backlog that represents decades of hiring neglect. When tens of thousands of teaching positions remain unfilled, the coaching industry functions as a private-sector substitute, available only to those who can pay. The government school teacher who earns Rs 18,000 per month cannot be blamed for the quality of instruction when they are covering three subjects across two grades because the positions for additional teachers were never filled. The shadow system thrives in the vacuum the state created.

And the talent drain from schools to coaching ensures the vacuum persists. A fresh IIT graduate can enter coaching at Rs 40,000 per month — already double the starting government teacher salary. At five years, coaching faculty earn Rs 17-20 lakh per annum. At ten years, Rs 40 lakh-plus. The “star” teachers at top coaching institutes earn Rs 3-4 crore per year. No government school system in India can compete with these numbers. The best teaching talent gravitates to coaching, which weakens schools, which increases dependence on coaching, which draws more talent to coaching. The spiral is self-reinforcing.

The Class Filter

Pierre Bourdieu’s framework of social reproduction, developed in the context of French education, maps onto Odisha’s coaching economy with uncomfortable precision. Bourdieu identified three forms of capital: economic (money), cultural (knowledge, skills, dispositions, credentials), and social (networks). The coaching industry is a machine for converting economic capital into cultural capital — exam-cracking skills — and ultimately into institutionalized cultural capital: an IIT or AIIMS degree.

The student who scores 99.9 percentile in JEE Advanced has typically had access to Rs 5-15 lakh of coaching over four to seven years, CBSE schooling rather than state board, an urban location with coaching center access, a family that could afford one member not earning income for two to four years, and social networks that informed the coaching investment decision. The “merit” displayed in the result is what Bourdieu called symbolic violence: the process by which class-based inequality is perceived as the natural outcome of individual talent, rather than the product of an unequal structure.

In Odisha, this mechanism operates with particular cruelty because of the state’s demographics. SC and ST communities together comprise nearly 40 percent of the population. Upper-caste families disproportionately occupy government service positions, professional roles, and urban centers — all of which correlate with coaching access. India’s wealth distribution along caste lines is stark: upper castes, roughly 25 percent of the population, hold approximately 55 percent of total wealth. In Odisha, where tribal communities comprise 22.8 percent of the population and are concentrated in remote, forested areas, the distance from coaching centers is not just geographic. It is civilizational.

A tribal student in Malkangiri — where literacy is 49 percent, where tribal literacy is 35 percent, where the nearest coaching center of any quality is in Bhubaneswar, 600 kilometres and a world away — has formal reservation in an IIT but no reservation for the coaching needed to reach the IIT exam. The reservation system operates at the point of admission. The filtering system operates at the point of preparation. By the time reservation applies, the class filter has already done its work. The coaching economy ensures that the majority of SC/ST/OBC students never reach the exam hall in a state of preparation that gives them a realistic chance. [Confidence: ~70%. The statement that coaching is the binding constraint rather than other factors like household educational environment is plausible but the causal chain is complex and other variables contribute significantly.]

The gender dimension adds another layer. In JEE Main 2025, female candidates represented approximately 33.73 percent of applicants — up from below 30 percent historically, but still reflecting a 2:1 male skew. NEET is the exception: more women take NEET than men, because medicine carries marriage-market value alongside career value in families that would not otherwise invest in daughters’ competitive exam preparation. (Cross-reference: The Invisible Half series documented how gendered ROI calculations shape educational investment. Coaching is a direct case study.) In rural and conservative communities, coaching investment is more likely directed toward sons. The perceived logic: a son’s IIT seat is transformative for the family. A daughter will marry and leave.

The Indian government’s free coaching schemes for SC/OBC students — covering fees up to Rs 75,000 and providing a Rs 4,000 monthly stipend — attempt to address the gap. But a stipend of Rs 4,000 per month is insufficient to cover the full cost of quality coaching plus living expenses in Bhubaneswar for an out-of-district student. The Pathani Samanta Mathematics Talent Scholarship provides Rs 5,000 per month for Class 11-12 students — more substantial, but limited in reach. The E-Medhabruti scholarship supports students after they clear competitive exams, during college — closing the barn door after the horse has left.

The coaching economy is India’s most efficient mechanism for converting economic capital into educational credential. It is also Odisha’s most efficient mechanism for ensuring that the children of the poor remain poor while appearing to have failed on merit.

The Government’s Impossible Position

The Odisha government’s response to the coaching economy reveals the paradox of a state trying to fix a system by building a parallel version of the thing that exposed the system’s failure.

The most significant intervention is the Odisha Adarsha Vidyalaya Sangathan (OAVS), established in September 2015. The network now operates 314 schools — one per block — serving over 109,000 students. The model is deliberate: CBSE-affiliated, fully day-boarding schools with modern facilities, smart classrooms, and laboratories, offering free education with 50 percent reservation for girls and targeting SC, ST, and OBC students. Admission is through an entrance examination at Class 6, with each class accommodating 80 students.

The OAV concept is structurally sound. It addresses the curriculum gap (CBSE affiliation), the access gap (one per block), the gender gap (50 percent girls), and the quality gap (dedicated faculty, modern infrastructure). If these schools can produce students competitive in JEE and NEET, the OAV model represents the most significant structural intervention in Odisha’s education system in decades.

But 314 schools serving 109,000 students in a state with over 80 lakh school-age children means OAVs reach approximately 1.3 percent of the student population. The intervention is meaningful but microscopic relative to need. The state has effectively conceded that its mainstream school system cannot prepare students for competitive exams, and has responded by building a small-scale replica of what private coaching and CBSE schools provide — rather than reforming the 61,000-school mainstream system to make coaching unnecessary.

The Pathani Samanta Mathematics Talent Scholarship (named after Samanta Chandrasekhar, the legendary 19th-century Odia astronomer-mathematician) identifies mathematical talent from Class 6 to Class 12 across all 314 blocks. At Rs 5,000 per month for Class 11-12 students, it could offset a significant portion of coaching fees. The Civil Services Coaching Scheme provides UPSC and OPSC preparation support. These interventions are real. They are also insufficient.

The scale mismatch is the fundamental problem. OAVs serve 109,000 students; the coaching need exists for hundreds of thousands. Most scholarships support students after competitive exam success, during college — not during the preparation phase, when families bear the costs. The centrally-funded coaching schemes for SC/OBC students require awareness and application processes that rural families cannot navigate. And unlike Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, where Sri Chaitanya and Narayana function as state-wide school-cum-coaching systems processing over 8.5 lakh students, Odisha has no comparable model that integrates school education with competitive exam preparation at scale.

The government is trying to fight the arms race by issuing body armor to 1.3 percent of the population. The other 98.7 percent are on their own.

The Geography of Extraction

The coaching economy creates a geography of extraction that mirrors Odisha’s mineral economy — a parallel that the value-chain series documented in detail. (Cross-reference: The Missing Middle traced how iron ore, bauxite, and coal leave Odisha as raw materials for processing elsewhere. The coaching economy follows the same pattern with human capital.)

Just as Odisha’s minerals leave the state for processing and value addition elsewhere, Odisha’s students leave for Kota, Hyderabad, and Delhi for “processing” in the form of coaching. The economic value generated by coaching — teacher salaries, infrastructure investment, support services, hostel revenues — is captured in Bhubaneswar at best and in Kota or Hyderabad at worst. Rural Odisha, which produces the students and the aspiration, captures none of this value.

The brain drain acceleration is the more damaging parallel. A student who goes to Kota for coaching, then to an IIT in Tamil Nadu or Karnataka, then to a job in Bangalore or abroad, has been progressively extracted from Odisha at each stage. The coaching investment funded by the family in Odisha generates lifetime returns that accrue entirely outside the state. Rs 10 lakh spent by a Ganjam family on two years of Kota coaching may produce an engineer earning Rs 20-50 lakh per year — in Bangalore, in Hyderabad, in San Jose. The family gets remittances. Odisha gets nothing else. The coaching economy is a critical node in the state’s brain drain pipeline: the mechanism through which parental sacrifice (labor migration) is converted into child departure (brain drain).

The migration pipeline documented in The Leaving operates through the coaching economy with mechanical precision:

Phase 1 (Labor migration): Parents migrate to brick kilns and construction sites, earning Rs 8,000-15,000 per month.
Phase 2 (Investment): Savings and remittances are directed toward children’s coaching.
Phase 3 (Student migration): The child migrates to Bhubaneswar or Kota.
Phase 4 (Brain drain): If successful, the child enters IIT/NIT/AIIMS and migrates to Bangalore, Delhi, or abroad.
Phase 5 (Permanent departure): The child builds a career and life outside Odisha.

At no point does the value stay in Odisha. The money flows inward (remittances from parental labor), then outward (coaching fees to national chains), then outward again (the trained child leaves permanently). The family achieves its objective — escape from poverty for the next generation. Odisha loses the investment it never made.

The Kerala Paradox and What It Means

Before concluding that better schools would eliminate the coaching economy, Kerala’s example offers a sobering correction. Kerala has India’s highest literacy rate and arguably the strongest public school system. It also has enormous coaching dependence: more than three-fifths of India’s total private coaching institutions are located there, serving nearly 1.5 lakh students. Rural Kerala households spend 17 percent of their education budget on private tutoring, compared to 8 percent in rural India overall.

If even a state with relatively good schools produces massive coaching demand, then the coaching economy is not purely a function of school failure. It is also a function of exam design. As long as competitive exams test skills that schools — even good schools — do not systematically develop, and as long as the returns to exam success remain as high as they are (an IIT degree is a lifetime economic advantage worth crores in present value), the demand for coaching will persist regardless of school quality.

The Tamil Nadu counter-example is more encouraging. Tamil Nadu’s coaching dependence is lower, and the explanation is not just better schools but a diversified economy that offers multiple pathways to middle-class life. Tamil Nadu has 35 of the top 100 NIRF-ranked colleges — a density of higher education opportunity that Odisha cannot match. When there are multiple routes to a good career, the desperation that drives the coaching arms race diminishes. The deepest solution to Odisha’s coaching economy may not be educational at all. It may be economic: if Odisha had the employment opportunities that made IIT/AIIMS unnecessary for middle-class survival, the arms race would decelerate. [Confidence: ~65%. The Tamil Nadu comparison is suggestive but multiple variables differ simultaneously. Isolating the “diversified economy” effect from “better schools” and “longer education investment history” is not cleanly possible.]

The international comparison sharpens the point. South Korean households spent 29.2 trillion won (US $20.2 billion) on private education in 2024 — 13.5 percent of monthly household expenditure, with 80 percent of students attending hagwon (cram schools). Japan’s juku system enrolls 65-plus percent of 9th graders. Both are wealthy, high-performing education systems with universal school quality far beyond India’s. They still have massive shadow education economies.

The critical difference: in South Korea and Japan, cram school participation is near-universal across class lines, making it less of a stratifying mechanism. In India — and particularly in Odisha — coaching access is sharply stratified by income, caste, and geography, making it a powerful reproducer of inequality. The arms race exists everywhere competitive exams exist. But in countries with greater economic equality, the arms race is a level playing field of waste. In Odisha, it is an unlevel playing field of waste, where the winners are predetermined by the starting resources.

The Consciousness Infrastructure

The coaching economy is not only an economic phenomenon. It carries within it an entire worldview: that competitive exams are the only legitimate pathway to social mobility, that formal education is inadequate, that success requires extraordinary financial sacrifice, and that “merit” is objective rather than constructed.

This consciousness shapes family decisions across Odisha in ways that are profound and self-reinforcing. The government school teacher in Bolangir who earns Rs 25,000 per month and sends his child to Allen Bhubaneswar for Rs 1.5 lakh per year is not just making a financial decision. He is participating in a belief system that says the state school he works in cannot educate his own child. The irony is devastating: the very person responsible for delivering public education has no faith in it.

The coaching economy also creates aspiration inflation. As more families invest, the competitive threshold rises. What was once achievable with good school education alone now requires coaching. What coaching alone could achieve ten years ago now requires coaching from Class 6, dummy school enrollment, and a dropper year. The system is a treadmill: the more families invest, the more everyone must invest, and the advantage always accrues to those who can invest the most. This is the arms race in its purest form.

Aspiration inflation has a corollary: the progressive delegitimization of alternatives. A diploma from an ITI, a degree from a state university, a career as a skilled tradesperson — these are increasingly not seen as legitimate aspirations by the families caught in the coaching economy’s gravity. The only acceptable outcomes are IIT, AIIMS, or IAS. Everything else is failure. This narrowing of aspiration is itself a failure — of imagination, of institutional design, of a system that has made a tiny set of exam-gated institutions the only tickets to dignity.

The National Education Policy 2020 gestures toward exam reform — competency-based assessment, portfolio evaluation, multiple entry and exit points in higher education. If implemented (a significant if), these reforms could begin to dismantle the exam architecture that sustains the coaching economy. But implementation requires the very institutional capacity that Odisha’s education system lacks. You cannot reform exams without first having teachers capable of assessing through new methods, schools equipped with the infrastructure for portfolio-based evaluation, and a bureaucracy willing to risk the disruption. Odisha has 44,433 teaching vacancies. The reform may arrive. The capacity to execute it may not.

The Equilibrium

Stand back far enough from the coaching economy, and the structural picture becomes clear.

The formal education system fails to prepare students for competitive exams. Coaching institutes fill the gap, but at a price that sorts students by family income. Families invest increasingly in coaching, redirecting resources from other uses. The coaching industry grows, attracting the best teaching talent away from schools. Schools weaken further. Coaching dependence increases. Families invest more. The cycle repeats.

This is an equilibrium. Not a good one — a collectively wasteful one where Rs 1,500-3,000 crore flows annually from Odisha families into an arms race that produces no additional seats, no additional learning, no additional opportunity. The arms race merely redistributes the same scarce seats among students pre-sorted by economic class, while the coaching industry captures the surplus. But it is a stable equilibrium, because no single actor has the incentive to change their behavior. The family cannot stop investing in coaching. The coaching institute cannot stop expanding. The government school system cannot attract better teachers at current salaries. The exam system cannot reform without political will that no government has mustered.

Game theory describes three ways an arms race ends. First, one side wins decisively — but in education, there is no “winning.” The seats remain finite. Second, both sides exhaust their resources and the race collapses — possible in theory, but the coaching industry’s growth shows no sign of exhaustion. Third, a binding agreement changes the rules for everyone simultaneously — exam reform, school reform, economic diversification that makes the race unnecessary. Only the third path leads somewhere.

Odisha’s coaching economy is not an aberration. It is the logical consequence of a system that creates scarcity of quality education, funds aspiration without funding capability, and then congratulates the winners for “merit” while ignoring the economic machinery that sorted them before they entered the exam hall. The shadow system is not the disease. It is the symptom. And like all symptoms, it tells you where the body is failing, if you are willing to look.

The father from Ganjam who sold his land to send his son to Kota was making the most rational decision available to him. The tragedy is not his decision. The tragedy is the system that made it the rational one.

Sources

Government and Institutional Data

MoSPI, Comprehensive Modular Survey: Education 2025 (NSS 80th round)
NTA NEET 2024 Results; Medical Dialogues state-wise breakup
JEE Advanced 2024 Results; SATHEE/IIT Portal state-level analysis
UPSC Civil Services Exam 2024 Results; Kalinga TV, Pragativadi reports on Odisha candidates
OPSC OCS 2023 Results; Careers360, Testbook reports
Odisha Adarsha Vidyalaya Sangathan official data (oav.edu.in)
Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Free Coaching Scheme
BSE Odisha, CHSE Odisha examination data
UDISE+ 2023-24, 2024-25 school infrastructure and enrollment data

Industry and Market Reports

IMARC Group, “India Coaching Institutes Market Size, Industry Report 2034”
BW Education, “Inside India’s Rs 50,000 Cr Coaching Industry”
Tracxn, Allen Career Institute financial data (revenue Rs 3,310 crore FY2025)
TechCrunch, Physics Wallah $2.8 billion valuation (2024)
Free Press Journal, “Kota Coaching Hub Revives” (enrollment and revenue data)
Business Standard, “Drop in students impact Kota coaching” (2024)

Academic Studies

Pal, Bhesera, Bika (2026), “Mental Health Conditions and Suicide Among Adolescent Coaching Aspirants: Case of Kota,” SAGE Journals
PMC (2024), “Stress and coping strategy among coaching and non-coaching students in Kota: A comparative study,” Indian Journal of Psychiatry
CSES India, “What Is Wrong With Kerala’s Education System?” (coaching participation data)

Coaching Institute Data

Allen Career Institute: 4 lakh students, 17,000+ JEE selections (2024)
Aakash Educational Services: 22,000+ JEE Main qualifiers (2024); fee structures Rs 77,000-3.5 lakh
FIITJEE: 12,000+ JEE Main selections (2024)
Resonance: 200 faculty, 70 IIT graduates, 10,000+ selections (2024)
Sri Chaitanya: 8.5 lakh+ students, 321 junior colleges
Physics Wallah: 120+ offline Pathshala centers

News and Ground Reports

The Print, “Selling land, borrowing money, eating less: What UPSC coaching does to poor families” (2023)
The Print/NCAER, “Private coaching rise is now a prestige issue for Indian families”
The Quint, “29 Student Suicides in Kota in 2023”
ETV Bharat, “Reclaiming Education: India’s Coaching Crisis”
Civilsdaily, “Only 3% of Kota’s students have visited a mental health professional”

International Comparisons

New Kerala, “S. Korea Private Education Spending Jumps 60%” (29.2 trillion won, 2024)
Korea Herald, “Korea’s private education sector rakes in profits” (13.5% of household expenditure)
Facts and Details, “Hagwons and Private Education in South Korea”
New World Encyclopedia, “Cram school” (Japan juku data)

Sociological Frameworks

Bourdieu, Pierre: cultural capital, symbolic violence, social reproduction (via Infed.org, Sociology.Institute analyses)

Cross-References to SeeUtkal Series

The Leaving (full_read) — Migration pipeline, brain drain, remittance economics
The Missing Middle / Value Chain (full_read) — Extraction economics, raw material leaving state for value addition elsewhere
The Invisible Half / Women’s Odisha (full_read) — Gendered investment calculations, coaching access disparities
The Long Arc — Extraction equilibrium, Nash equilibrium in political economy
The Churning Fire — Consciousness infrastructure, aspiration and belief systems
Urbanization Odisha — Bhubaneswar concentration, missing middle cities, coaching hub geography

Source Research

The raw research that informs this series.