On this page
English only · Odia translation in progress
Chapter 5: The Bakshi And The Paiks
The Paik Rebellion of 1817 is the centre of this first resistance.
It was not a perfectly planned war of independence. It was a spontaneous but meaningful explosion by a military class whose lands, honour, and social world had been damaged by early British rule.
Its central figure was Bakshi Jagabandhu Vidyadhar.
Who Was Jagabandhu?
Jagabandhu was the Bakshi of Khurda: the hereditary commander connected with the Raja’s military establishment. His family held lands and jagirs attached to that office. These included the Bakshibar lands and Killa Rorung.
He was not initially a rebel against the British. He submitted early after the British conquest. He understood the strength of the new power and did not rush into hopeless defiance.
This makes his later rebellion more important. He did not rebel because he failed to understand British power. He rebelled after experiencing British injustice.
His lands were resumed. His claims were ignored. Killa Rorung was taken from him through legal and administrative manipulation. A man who had stood near the top of Khurda society was reduced to dependence and humiliation.
In his own representation, he described not only his personal ruin but the misery of Khurda’s people. The old seat of the Gajapati had been left vacant. Farmers squeezed the people. Salt became expensive. People fell into destitution.
For Jagabandhu, personal dispossession and public suffering fused into one cause.
The Paikan Land Question
The paiks were not merely soldiers in the modern sense.
They were part of a social-military order. Their service was tied to land, status, and obligation. When paikan lands were resumed or disrupted, the British were not simply reforming military tenure. They were breaking the material base of a warrior community.
The paiks had already lost political centrality after Khurda’s fall. The resumption of land made that loss economic. Their identity, livelihood, and honour were all hit together.
This is why the rebellion had such force in Khurda. The paiks were not fighting only for wages or loot. They were fighting from a sense that their world had been made impossible.
The Spark From Ghumsar
In March 1817, a body of Khonds from the Ghumsar side entered Khurda.
It is not certain whether this was a regular predatory movement, a planned invitation, or a moment seized by Jagabandhu and his associates. Whatever the immediate cause, it became the occasion for revolt.
The Khonds were joined by Khurda paiks. Operations began in Banpur. Government money was looted. Police and administrative buildings were attacked. From Banpur, the rebellion moved toward Khurda, gathering local paiks along the way.
Government officers fled. Civil buildings in Khurda were burned. The rebellion moved quickly because fear of British authority had suddenly broken.
Gangpara And The Retreat
The British responded from Cuttack, sending detachments toward Khurda and Pipili.
At Gangpara, the paiks created a barricade. British forces attempting movement through the area faced fire and confusion. One detachment under Lieutenant Faris was attacked; Faris and an Indian subahdar were killed. Other British parties retreated.
These moments mattered psychologically. The British had conquered Odisha easily in 1803. Now, in the same province, local forces were forcing retreats, killing officers, and cutting movement between Cuttack, Khurda, and Puri.
The rebellion was not strategically strong enough to defeat the Company. But for a few weeks, it showed that British control was still fragile.
Puri Falls Into Rebel Hands
On 12 April 1817, martial law was proclaimed in Khurda. On the same day, the paiks entered Puri and burned the court building.
Puri was more than a town. It was the sacred centre of Odisha. Rebel entry into Puri made the rebellion symbolically larger than a local disturbance.
British officials and troops withdrew toward the coast and then to Cuttack. Communications were cut. Martial law was extended to Puri, Pipili, Lembai, and nearby areas.
But the rebels did not consolidate Puri. When Captain Le Favre advanced with artillery and disciplined troops, the paiks could not withstand the firepower and tactics. Puri was retaken. The Raja of Khurda was taken into custody and sent toward confinement.
The rebellion had reached its high point and begun to recede.
Suppression
Major Hamilton and other officers moved to restore British authority. Rebel groups were dispersed at Sarangarh, Pipili, Gop, Kujang, and other areas. Leaders were captured, tried, transported, hanged, or pardoned depending on the case.
Kujang saw serious action later in 1817. Stockades were stormed near Paradip. Arms, cannons, elephants, and leaders were seized. By October, the open phase of rebellion had largely been suppressed.
But suppression of the rebellion did not mean capture of Jagabandhu.
That became a separate story.
The Invisible Foe
Jagabandhu remained at large for years.
He moved through jungle, hill, and friendly territories. British officers suspected help from Nayagarh, Ranpur, Ghumsar, Banpur, and local dalbeheras. Rewards were offered. Pardon was discussed. Police and military arrangements were strengthened. Informers were used. Associates were arrested or induced to surrender.
Still he escaped.
Even after the rebellion had been militarily defeated, Jagabandhu’s continued freedom kept alive the possibility of renewed disturbance. That uncertainty strained the British administration for years.
He became less an army commander than a symbol of unfinished resistance.
Surrender Without Humiliation
Jagabandhu finally surrendered in May 1825.
The immediate pressure came through Nayagarh. The British warned the Raja of Nayagarh against sheltering or supporting him. Once that support weakened, Jagabandhu’s ability to remain outside the system declined.
He accepted terms that preserved some dignity. He was given allowance and restriction, not immediate execution. His close associates surrendered in hope of pardon. Krushna Chandra Bhramarbar also later surrendered.
Jagabandhu died in 1829.
His military ability should not be exaggerated. The rebellion lacked planning, coordination, equipment, and broader support. The plains people did not rise in sufficient numbers. The tributary rajas did not join. The paiks fought bravely but without the organization needed to defeat a modern army.
But Jagabandhu’s courage, endurance, and will remain extraordinary. For seven to eight years after defeat, he lived under pressure, scarcity, concealment, and danger without surrendering his spirit.
Why The Paik Rebellion Failed
The failure had several causes.
It was not planned in advance. It began suddenly.
It remained too localized around Khurda, Banpur, Puri, Pipili, Gop, and connected areas.
The mass of peasants in the plains did not become a disciplined popular force.
Other rajas did not unite behind Jagabandhu.
The paiks used older fighting methods against a state with artillery, disciplined infantry, supply lines, intelligence networks, and legal machinery.
The British divided, pardoned, rewarded, and punished with calculation.
This does not make the rebellion unimportant. It explains its historical position. The Paik Rebellion was not the final form of Odisha’s freedom struggle. It was the older form: armed, local, honour-based, land-based, and rooted in the collapse of Khurda’s world.
Khurda was not alone. In southern Odisha, resistance lasted longer and was often more organized.