On this page
English only · Odia translation in progress
Chapter 6: The Broken Centuries
After Prataparudra, Odisha moved toward disaster.
The empire did not fall because one enemy suddenly appeared. It weakened through succession disputes, ambitious ministers, rebellious chiefs, foreign pressure, and the loss of coordination at the centre. By the time the final crisis came, Odisha still had brave men, forts, and local power. What it lacked was unity.
That is why 1568 matters so deeply.
It was not only the death of a king. It was the end of Odisha’s independent central kingdom.
After Prataparudra
Prataparudra died in 1540.
After him, the throne became unstable. His sons ruled briefly and fell victim to court intrigue. Govinda Vidyadhara, the powerful minister, seized power. He had ability, but his rule did not restore the older order. It opened the door to more conflict.
The problem was not only personal ambition.
The Gajapati state had depended on a strong centre. Once that centre weakened, every powerful military house became a possible claimant. Ministers, commanders, feudatories, and regional chiefs began to act for themselves. Southern Odisha faced pressure from Golkonda. Bengal watched from the north. Internal rivals used external help.
The kingdom was still standing, but its frame had cracked.
Mukundadeva’s Last Attempt
Mukundadeva, also known as Mukunda Harichandan, rose through the violence of this period and took the throne in 1559.
He was capable, energetic, and militarily serious. For a time, he held Odisha together. He suppressed rivals, drove out enemies, and tried to play the larger politics of North India by making contact with Akbar against the Afghan power of Bengal.
But his position was dangerous.
Sulaiman Kararani of Bengal saw him as an enemy. The Afghan power did not want an independent Odisha allied to the Mughals. Mukundadeva’s own commanders were unreliable. Rival claimants waited for their chance.
When the Afghan invasion came, the centre failed.
Some of Mukundadeva’s generals deserted. Barabati was taken. A rival declared himself king near Cuttack. Mukundadeva had to turn back from one danger to face another. In the fighting near Jajpur, he fell.
The last independent ruler of Odisha died not only because of foreign invasion, but because Odisha’s own political house had split against itself.
1568
In 1568, Odisha passed into Afghan hands.
The figure of Kalapahar became attached to this trauma. In Odia memory, he stands for desecration, temple attack, and the humiliation of the sacred centre. Historical details may be debated, but the emotional truth of the memory is clear: Odisha experienced the fall as both political and religious catastrophe.
Jagannath’s image had to be protected.
The old Gajapati order was broken.
Khurda and Puri survived, but survival was not sovereignty.
That distinction matters. Odisha did not vanish after 1568. Local rulers continued. Ritual authority continued. The Khurda line carried Gajapati memory. Jagannath remained the centre. But the independent imperial state was gone.
Odisha entered the broken centuries.
Afghan And Mughal Odisha
Afghan rule in Odisha was unstable because Bengal itself was unstable.
Daud Khan, Munim Khan, Todar Mal, Man Singh, and other figures entered the struggle between Afghan and Mughal power. Battles around Tukaroi, the Subarnarekha frontier, and Bengal-Odisha routes show that Odisha had become a contested border between larger forces.
Under the Mughals, Odisha was drawn into the imperial system.
The Mughals did not erase every local chief. They used revenue, tribute, military pressure, and administrative divisions. Khurda retained a special position because of Jagannath and the memory of the old Gajapati line. That special position made Khurda both useful and suspicious to outside rulers.
Every outside power faced the same problem.
It could govern Cuttack and collect revenue, but it still had to deal with Puri.
It could discipline chiefs, but it still had to negotiate old symbols.
Khurda’s Strange Power
Khurda was not the old empire.
It did not command the great Gajapati armies. It did not control the vast eastern coast. It could not defeat the Mughals, Marathas, or British in open imperial war.
Yet Khurda mattered more than its territory.
The Raja of Khurda was linked to Jagannath. He carried the ritual memory of kingship. Other chiefs could treat him with a reverence that exceeded his material power. When outside rulers interfered with Khurda or Puri, they touched a symbolic centre larger than an estate.
This is why Khurda keeps returning in Odisha’s later history.
It was politically weak but symbolically charged.
That combination made it dangerous.
Taqi Khan And The Temple Crisis
In the eighteenth century, Taqi Khan’s conflict with Khurda showed again how politics and Jagannath were tied together.
When pressure on Khurda increased, Jagannath’s images were removed to safety. Pilgrimage was disrupted. Revenue from pilgrims was affected. The administration eventually had to recognise that hurting the temple also hurt the political and economic order around it.
The lesson was simple.
Puri could not be treated like an ordinary town.
Jagannath’s worship drew pilgrims, money, prestige, service groups, and public emotion. A ruler could tax pilgrims, but he could not make the temple irrelevant. If worship stopped or the image moved away, the ruler also lost revenue and legitimacy.
Even outside powers had to learn Odisha’s sacred politics.
Maratha Odisha
The Marathas took Odisha in the eighteenth century after long struggle with Bengal and Mughal-linked authorities.
Their rule was demanding, but not as deeply reorganising as British rule would later become. They collected revenue and tribute. They managed the temple. They dealt with chiefs. They used Odisha as part of a larger eastern strategy.
But they did not fully penetrate all local society.
Paiks, khandaits, chiefs, hill peoples, and coastal estates retained spaces of resistance and negotiation. Maratha control could be harsh, but it was often uneven. That unevenness allowed older forms of local power to survive.
This is why some Odias later felt British rule as a deeper shock.
The British did not simply demand tribute. They changed land, law, currency, salt, courts, police, and the relation between old intermediaries and the state.
The Marathas were overlords.
The British became a machine.
Balasore And The Frontier Coast
The northern coast, especially Balasore, played a special role in these centuries.
It connected Odisha to Bengal, trade, European factories, roads, and military movement. It was a frontier zone: forested in older periods, gradually settled, then drawn into commerce. English traders came first as merchants at ports like Balasore and Pipli. They watched, negotiated, and learned.
Balasore reminds us that Odisha’s fall to the British did not begin in 1803.
The Company had known the coast for a long time.
Factories became listening posts. Trade became information. Information became strategy.
When the British finally invaded, they were not entering a land they had never seen. They were entering a coast they had studied through commerce.
The Compression
If this chapter has to be reduced to one idea, it is this:
After 1568, Odisha lost its independent centre but did not lose its historical memory.
Afghans, Mughals, Marathas, and Europeans entered a land where Khurda, Puri, Jagannath, chiefs, paiks, ports, and hill societies still carried older authority. The kingdom was broken, but the pieces remained alive.
That is why British conquest would be quick in military terms, but difficult in social terms.
The land had already been wounded.
It had not become empty.